🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.